Flame War Survival Guide
We all know how emotional and opinionated animal lovers are. Just a brief look at the pet-related newsgroups will validate this. Flame wars are constantly raging! Well, don’t let them get you down, Bunky! Help is on the way! Just read the following and you will be armed to the teeth with strategies that really work. Veni Vidi Vici – you don’t ever have to lose a flame war again!
The following was found on the Cornell University Web Server
~ Author Unknown
The Golden Rule of Flaming
Flames should be witty, insulting, interesting, funny, caustic, or sarcastic, but NEVER, EVER, should they be boring.
The Twelve Commandments of Flaming
Make things up about your opponent: It’s important to make your lies sound true. Preface your argument with the word “clearly.” Example: “Clearly, Fred Flooney is a liar, and a dirtball to boot.”
Be an armchair psychologist: You’re a smart person. You’ve heard of Freud. You took a psychology course in college. Clearly, you’re qualified to psychoanalyze your opponent. Example: “Polly Purebread, by using the word ‘zucchini’ in her posting, shows she has a bad case of penis envy.”
Cross-post your flames: Everybody on the ‘Net is just waiting for the next literary masterpiece to leave your terminal! From the Apple II Roundtable to X-10 Powerhouse Roundtable, they’re all holding their breath until your next flame. Therefore, post everywhere.
Conspiracies abound: If everybody’s against you, the reason can’t possibly be that you’re a sh**head. There’s obviously a conspiracy against you, and you will be doing the entire ‘Net a favor by exposing it.
Lawsuit threats: This is the reverse of Rule #4 (sort of like the Yin & Yang of Flaming). Threatening a lawsuit is always considered to be in good form. Example: “By saying that I’ve posted to the wrong group, Bertha has libeled me, slandered me, and sodomized me. See you in court, Bertha.”
Force them to document their claims: Even if Harry Hoinkus states outright that he likes tomato sauce on his pasta, you should demand documentation. If Newsweek hasn’t written an article on Harry’s pasta preferences, then Harry’s obviously lying.
Use foreign phrases: French is good, but Latin is the lingua franca of Flaming. You should use the words “ad hominem” at least three times per article. Other favorite Latin phrases are “ad nauseum,” “veni, vidi, vici,” and “fettuccini alfredo.”
Tell ’em how smart you are: Why use intelligent arguments to convince them you’re smart when all you have to do is tell them? State that you’re a member of Mensa, or Mega, or Dorks of America. Tell them the scores you received on every exam since high school. Example: “I got an 800 on my SATs, LSATs, GREs, MCATs, and I can also spell the word ‘premeiotic’.”
Accuse your opponent of censorship: It is your right as an American citizen to post whatever the hell you want to the ‘Net (as guaranteed by the 37th Amendment, I think). Anybody who tries to limit your cross-posting or move a Flame War to email is either a communist, a fascist, or both.
Doubt their existence: You’ve never actually seen your opponent, have you? And since you’re the center of the universe, you should have seen them by now, shouldn’t you? Therefore, THEY DON’T EXIST! This is the beauty of Flamers’ logic.
Lie, cheat, steal, leave the toilet seat up.
When in doubt, insult: If you forget the other 11 rules, remember this one. At some point during your wonderful career as a Flamer you will undoubtedly end up in a Flame War with somebody who is better than you. This person will expose your lies, tear apart your arguments, and make you look generally like a bozo. At this point, there’s only one thing to do . . . INSULT THE DIRTBAG! Example: “Oh yeah? Well, your mother does strange things with vegetables.”
EXAMPLE REPLY POST . . . for the Rookie Flamer
I object to your use of the word “dear.” It shows you are a condescending, sexist pig. Also, the submissive tone you use shows that you like to be tied down and flagellated with licorice whips.
>While I found your article “The Effect of Belly-Button Lint
>on Western Thought” to be extremely thought-provoking,
“Thought-provoking?” I had no idea you could think, you rotting piece of swamp slime.
>it really shouldn’t have been posted in rec.scuba.
What? Are you questioning my judgment? I’ll have you know that I’m a member of the super-high-IQ Society Menstruate. I got an 800 on my PMS exam.
Your attempts constitute nothing less than censorship. There is a conspiracy against me. You, Riff Raff, and Simon Sinister have been constantly harassing me by email. This was an ad hominem attack! I have therefore cross-posted this to alt.flame, rec.nude, comp.graphics, and rec.arts.wobegon.
>Perhaps you should have posted it in misc.misc.
It is my right, as granted in the Bill of Rights, the Magna Carta, the Bible, and the Koran, to post where ever I want to. Or don’t you believe in those documents, you damned fascist? Perhaps if you didn’t spend so much time sacrificing virgins and infants to Satan, you would have realized this.
>Your article would be much more appropriate there.
Can you document this? I will only accept documents notarized by my attorney, and signed by you in blood. Besides, you don’t really exist anyway, you AI project, you.Print This Page